In the 1800s, diverse black communities from the South, West Indies, and Canada migrated to Boston. Initially holding services in homes before securing a dedicated worship space in Beacon Hill, a significant migration to Roxbury occurred in the early 20th century. With the stability of a settled community, churches in Roxbury established deep roots, offering vital services to the local population—services that would later be echoed by community centers.
Historically, Roxbury/South End was the area where Boston’s Black community was forced to live.
The use of redlining and “whites-only” developments meant most of Boston was off limits.
The Home Owners’ Loan Corporation, gave much of D7 the lowest “Security” grade in Boston - D, so the availability of mortgage funds were “very limited”
Freeway projects and urban renewal displaced over 20,000 Bostonians.
Despite making up only 5% of Boston’s total population in 1950, 32% of the families displaced by urban renewal were Black.
Under the Boston Redevelopment Agency, now the BPDA, the city displaced 5,239 families, or around 17,250 people in Roxbury and South End during urban renewal projects.
Most of these families were unable to obtain mortgages for new homes as banks would refuse to lend to Black and Brown families.
The city acquired this land through the forced removal of a significant section of the Black community in Roxbury and the South End.
This “sack” led to the elimination of thousands of Black owned homes and dozens of area businesses.
Inadequate preparations were made to accommodate the housing needs that resulted from the forced transplanting of the approximately 17,250 people impacted.
This was to the Black community’s detriment, but to the benefit of elements within City Government and the contractors, companies, and corporations that cooperated with various municipal administrations over the years.
Segregation remains persistent throughout D7, and the land that was forcibly taken by the city in the late 20th century is still being developed, more recently for privately owned affordable housing and mixed income housing.
Every socio-economic indicator is to the detriment of the Black and Brown communities and according to the most recent 2021 Boston Neighborhoods report, Roxbury holds the second highest % of Black residents at 51%, compared to 23% of all Boston. Roxbury also has the second least amount of white residents at 11%, compared to 44% of all Boston.
Lenders deny mortgages in majority-Black parts of Boston at 2.5 times the rate of majority-white areas, and deny Black applicants 3 times more often than white applicants.
Quality of life has led to a significant reduction in life expectancy in D7: in Roxbury the average life expectancy is 59 years old, while in Back Bay, the average life expectancy is 92 years old.
Additionally, public transportation was gutted and re-routed to more affluent/white areas, so economic opportunity decreased and segregation increased .
Since 1968, the homeownership gap between white and Black Bostonians has increased.
Black and Latino residents are 14% and 27% respectively less likely to own their own home than their white counterparts.
95% of all income restricted housing are rentals, meaning only 5% of affordable housing is creating economic opportunities for families.
78% of income restricted housing is privately owned, so private landlords are profiting off of people in affordable housing.
COVID unemployment has led up to 40% of renters to use their savings, which was more than twice the rate of homeowners’, to pay their rents.
There are 62 predominately white tracts in Boston.
These tracts contain 38% of the City’s total housing units, but only 18% of the city’s income-restricted housing units.
54% of housing in Roxbury is income-restricted leading to a concentration of low-income and impoverished families.
There is no way to prioritize or guarantee this income-restricted housing can go to Roxbury residents, so this is most likely causing wealth inequality by moving low-income families in one neighborhood.
Roxbury holds the highest poverty rate in Boston at 32% while holding the second most amount of Boston’s impoverished.
From 2013 to 2021, the poverty rate of Boston went down. However, since 2013, Boston’s poverty became more concentrated in communities of color.
The average Black population of neighborhoods which saw their poverty share increase is 30% While the average Black population of neighborhoods which saw their poverty share decrease is 7%
Roxbury saw a .40% increase of the poverty share while South Boston saw a .60% decrease and Jamaica Plain saw at 1.2% decrease.
Wally’s Cafe was established January 1, 1947 in Roxbury by Joseph L. Walcott, a Barbadian who immigrated to America in 1910. He was the first African American to own a nightclub in New England. The club hosted professional and student musicians, and jazz enthusiasts quickly became attracted to the venue. Its success influenced the establishment of other jazz venues throughout the city as crowds would gather there week after week. The original location remained open until 1979 when it moved across the street to 427 Massachusetts Avenue where it remains and maintains the decade long tradition until today.
The Hi-Hat, which first opened in 1937, was a white-owned club in a black neighborhood. Known as “America’s Smartest Barbeque”, the locale played music exclusively to a white audience. That was until 1948 when the owner noticed neighboring jazz joints, like Wally’s, were attracting crowds with their live bands and chose to openup the club to both white and black customers.
Storyville was established in 1950 by George Wein in Boston’s Copley Square Hotel and later relocated to Hotel Buckminster. Though he didn’t have an African American background, he sought to maintain the historical roots of jazz by naming his club after the former red-line district in New Orleans where jazz is believed to have begun. Yet despite having diversity in the musicians who performed, the clientele was mostly white. Meanwhile, the African American clientele remained regulars at the clubs in the neighborhoods where they were majority.
The city argues they need to build affordable housing in District 7 because it is where the most amount of publicly owned land is but this is only because they stole it from the community. Still, they fail to properly include the community in the development process, and perpetuate segregation and poverty.
The wealth needs to go back to the community whose land was stolen in the first place.
We need more opportunities for affordable homeownership, not the continuation of affordable rentals, of which 54% of the housing stock in Roxbury already consists of.
The 54% rate of affordable rentals of all housing stock in Roxbury is 9 times the percentage of affordable rentals that exists in Beacon Hill, the North End, and the Back Bay, neighborhoods that only have 6% of affordable rentals as their existing housing stock.
Less than 1% of all the affordable housing in Boston is in West Roxbury, which is significantly less densely populated so it would be more logical to create more affordable housing in.
A moratorium to allow an equitable and responsible development process where community needs are heard and met.
Redesign Article 80 into a streamlined community process through one incubator that is inclusive and transparent.
A community planning process that revolves around the community’s desires and wishes for how the land will be utilized and developed moving forward.
An effort to equitably disperse affordable housing to other districts will encourage economic diversity.
Copyright © 2024 District 7 - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.